Path: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu!spool.maxwell.syr.edu!drn.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-south.connect.com.au!news1.optus.net.au!optus!news.uwa.edu.au!nntp.waia.asn.au!203.59.27.186.MISMATCH!newsfeed.iinet.net.au!newsfeed.iinet.net.au!per-qv1-newsstorage1.iinet.net.au!per-qv1-newsstorage1.iinet.net.au!per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <43297223.D8E@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:07:47 +0800
From: Connor McDonald <connor_mcdonald@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: connor_mcdonald@yahoo.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (WinNT; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Re: CBO influences
References: <1126283179.991124.138480@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>   <1126284892.947680.217710@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1126294364.813025.287860@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> <dfsonr$5g9$1@nwrdmz03.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com> <1126306293.634107@yasure> <dftp0r$621$1@nwrdmz01.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com> <1126329859.958172@yasure> <dftu3v$82a$1@nwrdmz02.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com> <1126374364.66827@yasure> <dfvg2j$no3$1@nwrdmz01.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com> <43282C72.36FC@yahoo.com> <dg9dve$5em$1@nwrdmz03.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 53
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.59.118.201
X-Trace: 1126789664 per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au 12705 203.59.118.201
Xref: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu comp.databases.oracle.server:251592

Jonathan Lewis wrote:
> 
> "Connor McDonald" <connor_mcdonald@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:43282C72.36FC@yahoo.com...
> >
> > In terms of mreadtim < sreadtim, we've encountered this on all databases
> > at our current site that SAN attached as opposed to JBOD.  Haven't
> > really got the access to determine whether the SAN is *truly* yielding
> > better multiread IO times than singleread IO, but ultimately we've
> > resorted to
> >
> > - collecting system stats
> > - tweaking mread to just above sread to enable mbrc inclusion for the cbo
> >
> 
> That is an interesting tell-tale about what SANs
> are probably good at, and bad at, doesn't it.
> 
> Don't share a SAN if you want to run a high
> performance OLTP system - they're not very
> good for small, highly randomised I/Os.
> 
> --
> Regards
> 
> Jonathan Lewis
> 
> http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/cbo_book/ind_book.html
> Cost Based Oracle - Volume 1: Fundamentals
> On-shelf date: Nov 2005
> 
> http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html
> The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
> 
> http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/appearances.html
> Public Appearances - schedule updated 4th Sept 2005

I would generalise to SAN's are not good at IO... period

:-)
-- 
Connor McDonald
Co-author: "Mastering Oracle PL/SQL - Practical Solutions"
Co-author: "Oracle Insight - Tales of the OakTable"

web: http://www.oracledba.co.uk
web: http://www.oaktable.net
email: connor_mcdonald@yahoo.com


"Semper in excremento, sole profundum qui variat."

------------------------------------------------------------
