Re: No future for DB2

From: John Carlson <jwcarlson1_at_yahoo.com.invalid>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 22:25:12 -0400
Message-ID: <j3v2f1ph7b3fvcvt6vehhc5uhgj6aki0hm@4ax.com>

On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 05:36:54 +1000, Noons <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au> wrote:

>Madison Pruet apparently said,on my timestamp of 4/08/2005 5:32 AM:
>>>
>>>>I am sure IBM Global Services are just as happy to look after an Oracle
>>>>database as a DB2 database as an abacus if they can earn their hourly
>>>>fee for doing so... (LOL)!!
>>>
>>>and place heaps of their hordes on the job.
>>>27 dbas in a single project, I counted last time.
>>>As if ANY of them was a dba...
>>>
>>
>>
>> Noons --- I'd be very careful about talking of the number of DBA's required
>> to run a database system if I were you. I can quote some fairly impressive
>> system/dba ratios which are in place for the IBM Informix server.
>
>Me too. I can even tell you in which project IBMGSA
>placed the 27 dbas.

Oracle DBAs or DB2 DBAs?? 8-)

JWC Received on Wed Aug 03 2005 - 21:25:12 CDT