Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: No future for DB2 - slightly off-topic, discusses what people are being taught at uni

Re: No future for DB2 - slightly off-topic, discusses what people are being taught at uni

From: HansF <News.Hans_at_telus.net>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 20:18:46 GMT
Message-Id: <pan.2005.07.31.20.22.22.257712@telus.net>


On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 13:24:14 -0600, Mark A interested us by writing:

> But my philosophy is, regardless of the size of the table, that if an index
> will not be used (assuming that no one is going to do delete cascade or
> update on the parent division_code table), then whey have it?

This is one statement with which I can unconditionally agree.

It follows with my personal belief that the need of every index should be periodically re-evaluated, and - if it's existance can not (or can no longer) be justified, the index should be eliminated.

Thankfully, Oracle provides the ability to monitor index usage.

-- 
Hans Forbrich                           
Canada-wide Oracle training and consulting
mailto: Fuzzy.GreyBeard_at_gmail.com   
*** I no longer assist with top-posted newsgroup queries ***
Received on Sun Jul 31 2005 - 15:18:46 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US