Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: 9.2.0.4 - RHEL3
IANAL_VISTA wrote:
> Tom <tomNOSPAM_at_teameazyriders.com> wrote in > news:1121358937.32529.0_at_spandrell.news.uk.clara.net: > >
Well yes and no. Depends on how the OP defines sessions. Some rows in v_$session are PMON, SMON, etc. Some may be dead and still rolling back uncommitted transactions. The OP needs to more clearly define the requirement.
-- Daniel A. Morgan http://www.psoug.org damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)Received on Sat Jul 16 2005 - 09:53:42 CDT