Re: Failed installation of 10g on White Box Linux 3.0 x86

From: HansF <News.Hans_at_telus.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 19:38:54 GMT
Message-ID: <pan.2005.06.29.19.42.14.981050@telus.net>

On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 21:26:15 +0200, Matthias Hoys interested us by writing:

>
> What could be wrong ? White Box = Red Hat 3, no ?

No.

White Box = White Box. The functionality is identical, BUT the strings have been changed to protect the innocent [from infringing on Red Hat's copyright].

And it's the strings that are checked.

Go directly to Werner's site (http://www.puschitz.com). Read a bit .... this ain't Windows, we don't encourage illiteracy <g>

-- 
Hans Forbrich                           
Canada-wide Oracle training and consulting
mailto: Fuzzy.GreyBeard_at_gmail.com   
*** I no longer assist with top-posted newsgroup queries ***

Received on Wed Jun 29 2005 - 14:38:54 CDT