Re: s...port's - problem

Frank van Bortel wrote:

>
>
> Well, it is on Linux, as just seen!
> And let's not use the redirect bit - Okay? I feel it is not
> redirection, it's a new process, spawned from the server
> (initiated by the listener), that starts the communication
> on a redirected port#; the *initial* negotiation is always
> on the listener port - both sides!
> The client process gets a (random, but increasing per connection)
> port number assigned from the spawned server side process.
> No different if the client is Linux, or on the same machine, or
> from another.
> All assuming dedicated processes, of course.
>
> I will now go and enjoy a beer in the sunset; be back tomorrow.
> Cheers - I enjoy this discussion, Fabrizio, no pun taken so far!

Right - had my beer last night (two, actually), reread this and see I use redirect in the very same sentence!

It's not redirected, it's a new process started, communicating on another port. As written in the documentation.

-- 
Regards,
Frank van Bortel