Re: Help:RAC implemention of archived redo logs

From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:11:08 -0700
Message-ID: <1119643885.438108@yasure>

Dave wrote:

> "NewGuyOnRAC" <joebayerii(delete)@hotmail.com> wrote in message 
> news:dDZue.644$J12.598_at_trnddc05...
> 

>>We are trying to install RAC.
>>
>>I have one question, should I put archived redo logs on local drive and
>>use NFS to allow other nodes to access them, or should I put all the
>>archived redo logs of different nodes on single OCFS directory?
>>
>>Any difference in terms of performance?
>>
>>Your help is highly appreciated.
>>

> 
> 
> nfs for redo logs? ugh no way
> 
> nfs for anything rac no way 

Come on Dave get with NFS v3.

Oracle is using NFS for RAC.
I do 90% of my RAC installs with NFS mount. It is safe.
It is stable.
It is certified.

The fact that previous versions were not is not a valid reason to paint a technology with such a broad brush. Technology changes and your advice needs to too.

-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
http://www.psoug.org
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)

Received on Fri Jun 24 2005 - 15:11:08 CDT