Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: a heated discussion between Development Team & "a" DBA: reorg or not to reog

Re: a heated discussion between Development Team & "a" DBA: reorg or not to reog

From: ibodogan <idogan_tech_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 23 Jun 2005 18:24:09 -0700
Message-ID: <1119576249.929336.125970@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>


> That's why recreating the database works, you are essentially
> defragmenting those tables (and probably why your #5 blowups happened,
i don't think export/import defrags the tables; it just combines thes extents next to each other defragmenting the tablespace not the tables.if you have a 2G table, 1500M free and the rest is used, you'll still get 1500M free space in the table after export/import. That's why i did alter table move before the export/import to defrags the tables.

i just want to know what is the advantage of export/drop db/create db/import against export/drop users/create users/import...

> extent size - you still have crap extent info in your system tables
i don't get this..how can i still have crap after i drop the users.. there was no user table after i drop all the users that have any object

> 2. Listen to Sybrand. (Except

i know i'm a big fan of LMTs but it is out of question at this point.

> There are unsupported methods of not having to do the database
> recreation, but if terms like FET$ don't mean anything to you, I
> wouldn't recommend them.

i know fet$, uet$..that is why i will not mess with them..

i.d. Received on Thu Jun 23 2005 - 20:24:09 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US