Re: Performance difference between 2 machines

Fabrizio apparently said,on my timestamp of 23/06/2005 5:46 PM:

>
> I envy you endurance on 9i... honestly I gave up... I'm migrating
> whatever I can toward 10g. Oracle defeated me.

<rant>

I'd love to. But I got 30 odd 24X7 critical systems that all need to be upgraded to RHAS4 in order to take best advantage of 10g. These systems run a mix of perl, C++, python, apache and app servers who shall remain nameless. They ALL connect to Oracle dbs and all have been patched at some time or other to work properly.

If I take ONE of these systems into kernel 2.6 and 10g and this creates ONE problem that stops us from capturing what pays our salaries, I can assure you my own salary will be truly GONE.

Since I don't trust Oracle for ONE second with my salary, this is going to be a LONG testing exercise. At the end of which I'll be on 10gr2 and Oracle will have long ago started the marketroyd b/s on 11x. All the while stating their dbs don't need dbas: I agree, they need a full time patch specialist instead!

And there is preciously NOTHING those 'troyds can do that will change my reality, believe me! </rant>

<fuming>

Meanwhile, I'd appreciate ONE SINGLE 9irx release that actually WORKS the way it's supposed to work with RH? Pretty please, mr Oracle? For ONCE?

</fuming>

Nothing to do with anything in this ng, of course: just me venting...

Cheers
Nuno Souto
in sunny Sydney, Australia
wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam Received on Thu Jun 23 2005 - 07:46:00 CDT