Re: Hardware recommedation for redundancy?

"HansF" <News.Hans_at_telus.net> wrote in message news:pan.2005.06.22.00.03.19.485147_at_telus.net...
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:16:26 -0500, Code Monkee interested us by writing:
>
>> Can anyone recommend HW for running Oracle under Windows NT in a
>> redundant
>> configuration? We are currently running in backup mode using transaction
>> logs, but would like to switch to a scheme that wouldn't require downtime
>> to
>> switch over.
>
> By definition, switch over includes some down time.
>
> If you can not tolerate the switchover downtime, there must be some
> reason - turn that reason into $/minute and you have a business case to
> purchase Oracle RAC (if Oracle Database 10g Standard Edition, with it's
> included, free-of-charge, RAC is not good enough.)
>
> Then base your hardware on the RAC config.
>
>>
>> Is there someplace better to post this?
>>
>
> This is OK. cdo.server would be a bit better.
>
> --
> Hans Forbrich
> Canada-wide Oracle training and consulting
> mailto: Fuzzy.GreyBeard_at_gmail.com
> *** I no longer assist with top-posted newsgroup queries ***

Euh ? This IS cdo.server ;-) Received on Wed Jun 22 2005 - 15:09:19 CDT