Re: Multimaster replication confusion!

julius.cooper_at_gmail.com wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> Thx for the reply.
>
> As for the version: it's Oracle9i (sorry).
>
> Now, as to why we'd want to do it this way? The short answer is that
> we need high availability (99.9999999+), and they want to have local

Hope your 0.031536 seconds maintenance window/year will get you anything.

-- 
Regards,
Frank van Bortel