Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Database market share 2004

Re: Database market share 2004

From: Paul <paulsnewsgroups_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 16:11:53 +0100
Message-ID: <ebs0a1lueccv5v5o60epklcuhq5m3vkoqc@4ax.com>

DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org> wrote:

>> Oh, the data is valuable alright and in use by Blue Chip companies
>> across the world, many of whom would be clients of a certain large
>> aerospace manufacturing company situated in Washington State that you
>> can't talk about - United Airlines is an example of such client.
 

>> It could well be that the UA dba's are tearing their hair out, but
>> they're probably not the ones who made the purchasing decision about
>> the s/ware, and rocking the boat mightn't do their careers any good.

>No but on purely theoretical grounds, because I know we are NOT talking
>about United Airlines, they MUST be compliant with Sarbanes-Oxley.
>Compliance is not optional ... it is mandatory.

Maybe they are compliant? Why does using a db as a bitbucket make you uncompliant? (DRI is enforced in the creation scripts). Maybe you could point me to a site that gives an overview of Sarbanes-Oxley for the non-specialist accountant (obviously I can Google, but you might have a good one handy?).

I know for a fact that this company has UA as a client, but there may be wheels within wheels - web interfaces that connect to systems (which may be outside the US or may not be) and which take data from them (possibly old mainframe TPF type systems) which are possibly compliant? I'm not exactly sure where the buck stops and I would imagine that there would be lots of fingerpointing if anyone was looking at any time in the slammer. Suits and countersuits... maybe I should have done law?

>So refer to the simulated conversation above. Management can not and
>will not break federal law to save a few dollars. It just isn't going
>to happen. Not after Enron. Not after WorldCom. Not after ....

As I said, I'm not privy to the higher echelons of the arrangements these companies have made with each other - if you're interested I could give you a brief outline offline...

Paul...

-- 

plinehan __at__ yahoo __dot__ __com__

XP Pro, SP 2, 

Oracle, 9.2.0.1.0 (Enterprise Ed.)
Interbase 6.0.2.0;

When asking database related questions, please give other posters 
some clues, like operating system, version of db being used and DDL.
The exact text and/or number of error messages is useful (!= "it didn't work!").
Thanks.
 
Furthermore, As a courtesy to those who spend 
time analysing and attempting to help, please 
do not top post.
Received on Fri Jun 03 2005 - 10:11:53 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US