Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: CONNECT Role Privileges

Re: CONNECT Role Privileges

From: Frank van Bortel <frank.van.bortel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 20:10:46 +0200
Message-ID: <d7i925$hj1$1@news2.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>


Holger Baer wrote:
> DA Morgan wrote:
>

>> The following is quoted from the 10gR2 Beta document.
>> =======================================================================
>> The connect role privilege reduction feature reduces the number of
>> privileges granted to the connect role to one, the CREATE SESSION
>> privilege. The privileges have been removed from the connect role:
>>
>>  - CREATE CLUSTER
>>  - CREATE DATABASE LINK
>>  - CREATE SEQUENCE
>>  - ALTER SESSION
>>  - CREATE SYNONYM
>>  - CREATE TABLE
>>  - CREATE VIEW
>>
>> This feature assists customers in deploying secure configurations by
>> helping enforce the least privilege principle.
>> =======================================================================
>>
>> This change may or may not be related to the comments here, and
>> elsewhere, with respect to the dangers related to creating users and
>> giving them the CONNECT role. But it makes me very happy and I have
>> received permission to post it here at c.d.o.server.
>>
>> So be warned ... if you have been using CONNECT as the lazyman's way
>> of creating users with permission to connect to the database ... it
>> will not work the same way in the future unless you intentionally
>> modify the role. Hopefully no one will but rather will create their
>> own custom roles that reflect job titles and responsibilities.

>
>
> Well finally. Developers will have to learn what roles are about. Are there
> any changes to resource as well or are the removed priveleges silently
> added
> to the resource role?
>
> You know, people insist in grant connect, resource to myuser, and the
> Oracle Documentation sets some really bad examples (why the hell should
> the RMAN catalog owner get resource and connect on top of
> recovery_catalog_owner, as the
> 10g RMAN Reference suggests?).
>
> But still good to know.
>
> Holger

I always granted them dba - sometimes I had to add select any table, though.
Usually does gets the job done.

BWUHAHAHAHAH (smell the sulfur yet?)

-- 
Regards,
Frank van Bortel
The comments in this message should only be used by experienced users.
I can take no responsibility for accidents or damage caused by following
the above advice. I am not liable in any way.
Received on Tue May 31 2005 - 13:10:46 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US