Billy wrote:
> josodijk2_at_gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>>We're about to replace 20 Unix systems. New hardware includes a SAN.
>>Upgrading to Oracle 10G (mostly 1, but 1 host might have 15 instances)
>>is part of the project. None will have 'high performance' requirements.
>>Database sizes are in the 10 - 50 GB range. Ease of admin (both at the
>>DBA and at the SA level) is important.
>>
>>Is ASM a good thing in this environment?
>
>
> Who cares!?
>
> After all, the plan is to run 15 instances on one host.. which means 15
> times the admin requirements on that host, 15 times the problems, 15
> times TEMP/REDO/ARCHIVELOG/etc space requirements, 15 times the
> footprint of an Oracle instance ito DBWR, LOGWR, PMON, SMON and so on..
>
> Come one.. ASM or not ASM does not matter at all in such environment.
> It is already shot to hell admin and performance wise.
>
> --
> Billy
True. I wasn't focusing on that part. But true. Hopefully the OP didn't
mean what was actually written.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
http://www.psoug.org
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
Received on Tue May 31 2005 - 08:38:46 CDT
