Re: Question on the date after '31-DEC-9999' in Oracle

From: Noons <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au>
Date: 24 May 2005 05:42:14 -0700
Message-ID: <1116938534.037318.207320@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>

Holger Baer wrote:
> >>4. Is this a bug I need to report ?

would anyone care? ;)

>
> Not according to the documentation (sql reference 9i):
>
>
> DATE
>
>
> Valid date range from January 1, 4712 BC to December 31, 9999 AD
>

Amazing! That's what I call future-proofing a product! :D Received on Tue May 24 2005 - 07:42:14 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Connor McDonald: "Re: PK Index V Additional Column INdex"
Previous message: Tony Andrews: "Re: Question on the date after '31-DEC-9999' in Oracle"
In reply to: Holger Baer: "Re: Question on the date after '31-DEC-9999' in Oracle"
Next in thread: Holger Baer: "Re: Question on the date after '31-DEC-9999' in Oracle"
Reply: Holger Baer: "Re: Question on the date after '31-DEC-9999' in Oracle"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US