Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Active Directory Query
Niall Litchfield schrieb:
> ame..._at_iwc.net wrote:
>
>>Hi, >> >>I'm trying to write a query that will, from Oracle 8i, query a
>>Active Directory and return values based on the query. >> >>I'm not finding anything useful on this topic and was wondering if >>anyone else had tried this. >> >>Sybrand, yes I've looked at the manuals, for 3 weeks now, and I've
>>come up with anything. >> >>If you know the answer, please provide the query. Otherwise, telling >>me to look back in the manuals again is wasting time.
I disagree with you, there are fully LDAP compliant support in 8i.
The fact that Oracle 8i was released before W2K doesn't matter, both
products are LDAP compliant, that means they can communicate with each
other over LDAP protocol ( no need to load external client , of course
possible too).
It is well documented by MS
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/techinfo/overview/ldapcomp.mspx
as well by Oracle
http://download-uk.oracle.com/docs/pdf/A86082_01.pdf
Pp:2-22,3-2
As Sybrand posted some days ago to similar topic, it is fully enough to
run as sys the $ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/admin/catldap.sql to get fully
functional LDAP client into the database ( more precisely C API is just
here, script creates only PL SQL API, which is a little bit restricted
compared to C, but covers the core functionality).
I just have tested the sample code from the OID Application Developer’s
Guide, simply replaced host,port,account and base dn with those from my
Domain Controller - it works perfectly. I didn't have access to W2K3,
but assume, there are basically no difference. Moreover (maybe i am
wrong on this) , 9i and 10g didn't significantly enhanced the
functionality of PL SQL API, the major improvements concern OID itself
and AD ( as well as other 3rd party) Directory Integration, Identity
Management etc, but to query any LDAP compliant Directory ( as AD is ),
8i is fully capable.
Best regards
Maxim Received on Wed May 11 2005 - 14:00:12 CDT