Re: UML and OCL

From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 08:41:26 -0700
Message-ID: <1115739435.289745@yasure>

Tim Arnold wrote:

> That's funny.  Well, not funny-ha-ha, more funny-strange - because I was
> just writing an article about relational database people who haven't a
> clue about modeling....
> 
> 
> "DA Morgan" <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message
> news:1115264241.920734_at_yasure...
> 

>>I found these two links in the SQL Server usenet group and
>>think they will be both of value, and appreciated, by those
>>here that have to deal with those schooled in UML that think
>>they understand relational databases.
>>
>>http://www.dbdebunk.com/page/page/622916.htm
>>http://www.dbdebunk.com/page/page/622867.htm
>>
>>The links are to Part 1 and Part 2 of an article by Chris Date.
>>--
>>Daniel A. Morgan
>>University of Washington
>>damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
>>(replace 'x' with 'u' to respond)

You mean like people that top post? ;-)

There are a very substantial number of people, especially in non-Microsoft databases that have a good background in modeling.

-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with 'u' to respond)

Received on Tue May 10 2005 - 10:41:26 CDT