Re: W2K3 vs RHAS performance: Windows wins.

From: Dave <x_at_x.com>
Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 17:48:13 GMT
Message-ID: <xD8de.22968$G8.21296@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk>

<jonas_at_cyberspace.org> wrote in message news:1114969234.728397.289910_at_o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Hello:
> I have installed the same Oracle version (10.x) on a Windows 2003
> Server and on a Linux RHAS 3. I have created the same database and run
> some querys. The hardware and the data are the same and in Linux I have
> set the recommended kernel parameters. The W2K3 filesystem is NTFS, and
> the Linux FS is ext3. They are default installations.
> The RHAS is three times slower than the W2K3. Why? What can I do to
> improve the Linux performance?
>
> Thanks.
>

well why should it be as quick or faster? Received on Sun May 01 2005 - 12:48:13 CDT