Re: [Q[] any one install ORACLE 9ir2 on Redhat 4 (32 bits)?????

On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 19:27:33 -0800, DA Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote:

>Andy Hassall wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 16:14:17 -0800, DA Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>StenR wrote:
>>>
>>>>>Can you provide a link or doc number. I can not find any support for
>>>>>9iR2 documented with Redhat 4.
>>>>
>>>>Click your way through the "Certify and Availability" menus to build
>>>>the Linux(x86) certification matrix, and you'll see RHEL4 is one of the
>>>>certified Linux flavors with 9.2 (9.2.0.6)
>>>
>>>I did and it is not there.
>>
>> Yes, it is, look again.
>>
>> The matrix shows 9iR2 is certified against "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4", but
>> 10gR1 isn't (yet).
>>
>>>Red Flag DC Server 4.0 (China Only) is not RedHat 4.
>>
>> Move eyes up one row ;-)
>
>If you check 9.2 you are correct.
>If you check 10g you are not.
>
>Checking both is giving you misinformation.

 Eh? 10g isn't listed as certified against RHEL4, and nobody's claimed that so far. 9iR2 is certified against RHEL4, and you denied that. Where's the misinformation? If you check 9.2 you get the 9.2 certification matrix - which includes RHEL4. If you check 10g on its own, you get the 10g certification matrix, which does not include RHEL4. If you check both, you get both certification matrices after each other, which shows exactly the same as checking them individually; 9iR2 OK on RHEL4, 10g not OK.

-- 
Andy Hassall / <andy@andyh.co.uk> / <http://www.andyh.co.uk>
<http://www.andyhsoftware.co.uk/space> Space: disk usage analysis tool