Re: Development Trends in Web and Oracle

From: Hexathioorthooxalate <ruler_at_removemetoemail.clara.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 21:22:42 -0000
Message-ID: <1110662555.59909.0@nnrp-t71-01.news.uk.clara.net>

>
> Huge deal or have you never run a StatsPack on a working application
> that stores XML?

Too little information here to comment. Storing the XML as a CLOB, as XMLTYPE, as XMLTYPE with schema validation, ..... etc. Come on get serious.

"DA Morgan" <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message news:1110655927.166588_at_yasure...
> Hexathioorthooxalate wrote:
>
>> "Noons" <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:4232e7cb$0$5484$5a62ac22_at_per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>>
>>
>>
>>>There is NO "so you are saying". What I said is PERFECTLY clear
>>>and understandable: an overhead of 73 times longer is NOT a
>>>The overhead? 36*2+1 longer to process a single byte
>>
>>
>> Ok the information being processed is more verbose, big deal!
>
> Huge deal or have you never run a StatsPack on a working application
> that stores XML?
>
> Sorry for the rhetorical question.
> --
> Daniel A. Morgan
> University of Washington
> damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
> (replace 'x' with 'u' to respond)
Received on Sat Mar 12 2005 - 15:22:42 CST