Re: Development Trends in Web and Oracle

Hexathioorthooxalate wrote:

> "Noons" <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> news:4232e7cb$0$5484$5a62ac22_at_per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>
>
>

>>There is NO "so you are saying".  What I said is PERFECTLY clear
>>and understandable: an overhead of 73 times longer is NOT a
>>The overhead?  36*2+1 longer to process a single byte

Huge deal or have you never run a StatsPack on a working application that stores XML?

Sorry for the rhetorical question.

-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with 'u' to respond)