Rick Wessman wrote:
> In article <119515402.0000a8e5.095_at_drn.newsguy.com>, Thomas Kyte says...
>
>>In article <1109466467.879849.188260_at_o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
>>fitzjarrell_at_cox.net says...
>>
>>>
>>>G Quesnel wrote:
>>>
>>>>I have ...
>>>>Oracle 10.1.0.2.0 on Solaris 64bits
>>>>sqlnet.ora > SQLNET.AUTHENTICATION_SERVICES= (NTS)
>>>>sqlnet.ora > NAMES.DIRECTORY_PATH= (TNSNAMES)
>>>>sqlnet.ora > NAMES.DEFAULT_DOMAIN = world
>>>>id> uid=1100(oracle) gid=200(dba)
>>>>init...ora > remote_login_passwordfile = exclusive
>>>>
>>>>orapwd file=$ORACLE_HOME/dbs/orapw$ORACLE_SID password=abcdef1
>>>>
>>>>I can connect with sqlplus /nolog ...
>>>>connect sys/abcdef1 as sysdba
>>>>But the following wont work
>>>>SQL> connect / as sysdba
>>>>ERROR:
>>>>ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
>>>>
>>>>I've even rebuilt the password file by
>>>>1.Shutdown immediate
>>>>2.issue the orapwd to build a new password file
>>>>3.startup the database (after connecting sys/abcdef1 as sysdba)
>>>>4.issue alter user sys identified by abcdef1;
>>>>5.issue grant sysdba to sys;
>>>>and the connect / as sysdba still generates the ORA-1031
>>>>
>>>>How can I fix this problem ?
>>>>(or determine that I must re-install the Oracle software)
>>>>
>>>>TIA
>>>>
>>>>Note: This is the information in $ORACLE_HOME/root.sh ...
>>>>ORACLE_USER=oracle
>>>>DBA_GROUP=dba
>>>>CHGRP=/bin/chgrp
>>>>ORACLE_HOME=/u01/app/oracle/product/10g
>>>
>>>If this is truly 64-bit Solaris WHY on earth are you using NTS
>>>authentication? Such authentication service is reserved for the
>>>Windows operating system, certainly NOT Solaris.
>>>
>>>I'd change that immediately and reap the benefits.
>>>
>>>
>>>David Fitzjarrell
>>>
>>
>>
>>good eye, that would do it.....
>>
>>
>
>
> Yep.
>
> Another poster asked why Oracle wasn't smart enough to know that NTS was not a
> valid authentication mechanism on a non-Windows platform. Basically, it's
> because to do so would have made the code more complex and harder to support.
> The assumption was made that the installer would set the parameter properly.
>
> Rick
>
>
or the configuration files were just copied over from anaother
system (would be a windows machine, then...)
--
Regards,
Frank van Bortel
Received on Mon Feb 28 2005 - 09:05:43 CST
