Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: RAC vs. J2EE

Re: RAC vs. J2EE

From: Jim Kennedy <kennedy-downwithspammersfamily_at_attbi.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:53:31 -0800
Message-ID: <WOmdnTZxoMmirInfRVn-3A@comcast.com>

"nullpointer" <null_pointer_at_rediffmail.com> wrote in message news:1108485273.049489.325060_at_f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> 1. I dont see why not. The primary objectives are
> > availability,
> > manageability, and scalability.
> and oracle has been working longer and harder on those than most app
> server companies. I think moving large chunks of business logic which
> is running just fine to EJB's serves no purpose other than to enhance
> someones resume and add a large overhead. And then people want to do
> transactions in the J2EE layer ( uggh ) my advice keep it in the DB
>
> 2. I dont know anywhere where J2EE beats the DB since if the DB is down
> pretty much everything goes down .
>
> 3. In case you want to manipulate data and have logic that works
> primarly of the data use PL/SQL. If you have other requirements
> consider java.
>
> Just my two cents
> I am sure many will disagree.
>
> Regds
> Dev
>
>

<snip for brevity>
I'll drink to that.
jim Received on Wed Feb 16 2005 - 23:53:31 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US