DA Morgan wrote:
> DH wrote:
>
> > "Mark A" <nobody_at_nowhere.com> wrote in message
> > news:YYidndF07OuUQWvcRVn-2A_at_comcast.com...
> >
> >>"Jim" <no-spam_at_no-spam.org> wrote in message
> >>news:d7mdv0552m04gccmphbgcl1jqheip2g2jd_at_4ax.com...
> >>
> >>>Thank you. Your point is...?
> >>
> >>I did not have any point. The post provided information from
another
> >>website concerning comparative database performance.
> >>
> >>I already apologized for posting it, since I did not know that this
> >>information was posted and discussed here previously.
> >>
> >
> >
> > I don't see any reason why you apologize. The previous post on
this topic
> > was titled "New IBM Nonsense".
>
> That is incorrect. The initial post was made to comp.databases.oracle
> and was a pro-DB2 slam on Oracle. Go to google groups and look it up.
> What you found here is a follow up response to the original post.
LOL!
They huff'n they puff....
Bordering on the ridiculous.
Received on Wed Jan 26 2005 - 19:28:50 CST
