Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Sun ZFS vs. Oracle ASM

Re: Sun ZFS vs. Oracle ASM

From: Chris Morgan <cm_at_mihalis.net>
Date: 24 Jan 2005 12:16:42 -0500
Message-ID: <86vf9m9285.fsf@elrond.bloomberg.com>


Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik_at_Sun.COM> writes:

> "Will Hartung" <willh_at_msoft.com> writes:
>
> >How would you compare a Sol 10 box with ZFS to something like a NetApp?
>
> Depends on which S10 box; thumper would do nicely.

you're teasing us now!

Chris

filler
441 437 Rejected 3 000001 TooSmall
Couldn't send message via news: 441 437 Rejected 3 000001 TooSmall Mark set [14 times]
Sending...
441 437 Rejected 3 000001 TooSmall
Couldn't send message via news: 441 437 Rejected 3 000001 TooSmall Mark set [6 times]
Sending...
441 437 Rejected 3 000001 TooSmall
Couldn't send message via news: 441 437 Rejected 3 000001 TooSmall Mark set [4 times]
Sending...
441 437 Rejected 3 000001 TooSmall
Couldn't send message via news: 441 437 Rejected 3 000001 TooSmall Mark set [6 times]
 wMark set
Mark set
Auto-saving...done
Sending...
441 437 Rejected 3 000001 TooSmall
Couldn't send message via news: 441 437 Rejected 3 000001 TooSmall Mark set [2 times]
441 437 Rejected 3 000001 TooSmall
Couldn't send message via news: 441 437 Rejected 3 000001 TooSmall Mark set [14 times]
Sending...
441 437 Rejected 3 000001 TooSmall
Couldn't send message via news: 441 437 Rejected 3 000001 TooSmall Mark set [6 times]
Sending...
441 437 Rejected 3 000001 TooSmall
Couldn't send message via news: 441 437 Rejected 3 000001 TooSmall Mark set [4 times]
Sending...
441 437 Rejected 3 000001 TooSmall
Couldn't send message via news: 441 437 Rejected 3 000001 TooSmall Mark set [6 times]
 wMark set
Mark set
Auto-saving...done
Sending...
441 437 Rejected 3 000001 TooSmall
Couldn't send message via news: 441 437 Rejected 3 000001 TooSmall Mark set [2 times]

-- 
Chris Morgan
   "Post posting of policy changes by the boss will result in 
    real rule revisions that are irreversible"

		- anonymous correspondent
Received on Mon Jan 24 2005 - 11:16:42 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US