Re: Index compression vs. table compression

From: Howard J. Rogers <hjr_at_dizwell.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 08:00:50 +1100
Message-ID: <ct13a4$pam$1@news-02.connect.com.au>

Richard Foote wrote:
> "Howard J. Rogers" <hjr_at_dizwell.com> wrote in message
> news:ct0s43$fhh$2_at_news-02.connect.com.au...
>

>>Richard Foote wrote:
>>
>>
>>>There is no hidden agenda, there is no mysterious plot, there is no 
>>>personal vendetta, there is no secret monies being exchanged for 
>>>unscrupulous deeds, there is no mission to select the 10 most beautiful 
>>>male and female DBAs in the world in order to transport them to a hidden 
>>>base in outer space so that a deadly chemical agent can kill off the rest 
>>>of mankind so that the select 10 (via a FTS of course) can come back and 
>>>DBAs rule the world ...
>>
>>You reported me to Oracle management once for having passed on 
>>commercially sensitive information to Steve Adams. Without one shred of 
>>actual evidence, of course. And without it being even remotely true.
>>

>
>
> Hi Howard,
>
> Oh dear, it's now bordering on the paranoid delusional !!
>
> Of course I didn't report you for any such thing which you can confirm with
> the HR department or with my supervisor at the time.

Since Surinder told me unequivocally that you did, along with others, I shall simply stick with what I know to be the case.

> That said, we both know who did report you, who can also confirm that I
> didn't.
>
> Now, back to the *subject* on hand, what's all this about small lookup
> tables being read by FTSs...

No, that wasn't the subject. The word "lookup" is of your invention.

HJR Received on Sun Jan 23 2005 - 15:00:50 CST