Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle 10g (ASM vs Veritas Clustered FS)

Re: Oracle 10g (ASM vs Veritas Clustered FS)

From: <Daniel_F_at_addamark.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 19:51:28 GMT
Message-ID: <4hYBd.2238$iu5.416@fe2.columbus.rr.com>


In comp.unix.solaris DA Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote:
>
> If something goes wrong would you rather have two different
> software companies pointing fingers at each other or have
> the entire problem solved with a single iTAR?
> It isn't just about money.

Something goes wrong and you have 1 vendor? Nope, you have two vendors. 1 vendor doing the dynamic multi-pathing & 1 vendor doing the volume management (Oracle).

Right now I'm running Brocade, Emulex, EMC Clarrions & DMX's with Solaris/Sparc as the OS/Hardware solution & Veritas for clustering and storage management.

Not much finger pointing going on there.

Seperating OS issues from database issues is very basic IMO. Received on Sun Jan 02 2005 - 13:51:28 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US