Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle 10g (ASM vs Veritas Clustered FS)

Re: Oracle 10g (ASM vs Veritas Clustered FS)

From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 15:21:21 -0800
Message-ID: <41d33ae4$1_4@127.0.0.1>


jeff_vosburg_at_aliases.com wrote:

> If price is not an issue, which is a better solution to
> use? Oracle 10g w/Automated Storage Manager or Veritas's
> Enterprise Storage Foundation (with clustered filesystem).
>
> Big disadvantage I see to ASM is that we can only use
> raw volumes & depend entirely on RMAN for backups/restores.
>
> This is for 3 Sun v440's that hope to run Oralce 10g RAC.
>
> -JV

If something goes wrong would you rather have two different software companies pointing fingers at each other or have the entire problem solved with a single iTAR?

It isn't just about money.

-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with 'u' to respond)
Received on Wed Dec 29 2004 - 17:21:21 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US