Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: RMAN/Alert_log questions
"Howard J. Rogers" <hjr_at_dizwell.com> wrote in
news:41cbef56$0$6541$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au:
> jw wrote:
>> Thanks for the response. >> >> Here are my observations: >> >> 1. I have two Arch processes. but I only see that "unable ..." >> message when I started "BACKUP DATABASE PLUS ARCHIVE LOG" from RMAN. >> The RMAN first did a Log Switch and backup the Archive Log files. It >> seems this is the time it quoted the message. For other time of the >> day, I didn't see the message. >> >> 2. For the Fractured Block, I saw it several times in a week (I did a >> daily rmAN backup at 3:00). And it happened at the same dba; and >> quoted "found valid data" after reread. As the data file is for >> index tablespace, I am not sure I need to do anything as a proactive >> action.
>
> RMAN's great claim to fame is that it doesn't cause SQL commands to
> generate vast quantities of redo. And the reason it doesn't do so is
> that it is an Oracle utility, and therefore can spot a fractured block
> when it sees one -at which point, it will simply keep re-reading it
> until it gets a clean image of the block (once it's quieted down a
> bit).
>
> In short, fractured blocks are completely expected when doing hot
> backups. So, too, is RMAN's response to them: keep re-reading them
> until a non-fractured image can be captured. It's what makes RMAN
> RMAN.
>
> Oh -and your point one is pure coincidence.
>
> Regards.
> HJR
>
Received on Fri Dec 24 2004 - 08:37:40 CST