Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: RAID 5 vs RAID 10 benchmark

Re: RAID 5 vs RAID 10 benchmark

From: Jonathan Lewis <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 07:54:09 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <cpu3b1$em1$1@titan.btinternet.com>

I thought Hamming codes were a little sophisticated - whereas Raid-5 parity simply does an XOR across the data blocks to generate the parity block. That way ANY one block is equivalent to the XOR across all the other blocks in same stripe, which is why you can reconstruct any failed block if you have all but one of the blocks in the stripe.

-- 
Regards

Jonathan Lewis

http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html
The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ

http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html
Optimising Oracle Seminar - schedule updated Sept 19th





"Frank van Bortel" <fvanbortel_at_netscape.net> wrote in message 
news:cprmib$q43$1_at_news1.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...

>
> In addition to the redundancy in data, the Hamming codes
> used for parity calculations, can recreate the missing
> parity bit from remaining disks, thus allowing one disk
> to go bad.
> However, 2 bits cannot be recalculated
> (aka when 2 disks go bad: failure).
>
Received on Fri Dec 17 2004 - 01:54:09 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US