Sybrand Bakker - request for a list of insults

From: Pete <peter.claridge_at_lycos.co.uk>
Date: 11 Dec 2004 07:04:24 -0800
Message-ID: <9a9277b9.0412110704.6be5de8f@posting.google.com>

I am wanting to put together a collection of the demeaning one upmanship comments SYBRAND BAKKER has written in this and related groups. This will be used for a website I am creating. If you have some then post to this thread please. Typical examples (the entire thread can be viewed in Google groups) are:

From: Sybrand Bakker (postbus_at_sybrandb.demon.nl) Subject: Re: 1031, insufficent priv error & dbms_session.set_context line 58
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server Date: 2002-07-03 10:59:03 PST

This is sooooooooooooo......... boring
If people would search the archives that would reduce the traffic in this group with 80 percent, and the small bunch of people responding here wouldn't have to waste their time to repeat the same answer over and over again.

AND From: Sybrand Bakker (gooiditweg_at_nospam.demon.nl) Subject: Re: Foreign Keys
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server Date: 2003-01-05 15:00:52 PST

This can't be a serious question.
What else did you expect? The * purpose * of the foreign key is to avoid orphaned records and to enforce relational integrity. You need a foreign key if you have a *relationship* between 2 entities. If you don't define foreign keys and don't enforce relational integrity, you will end up in a mess. Obviously, given your question, you don't care about that.

PLEASE ALSO INCLUDE ANSWERS FROM THE NEWSGROUPS ABOUT SYBRAND BAKKER. A TYPICAL EXAMPLE IS BELOW: From: pol15_at_my-deja.com (pol15_at_my-deja.com) Subject: F45 question (not for Sybrand Bakker the social misfit) Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.tools
Date: 2000/06/21

FIRSTLY, SYBRAND. AS I AM IN NO DOUBT THAT YOU ARE READING THIS, PLEASE MAKE NO ATTEMPT AT ANSWERING THE QUESTION BELOW. THIS IS FOR 2 REASONS .....

I HAVE READ A FEW OF YOUR ATTEMPTS AT ANSWERING ORACLE FORMS QUESTIONS, AND YOU ARE TO SAY THE LEAST, TOTALLY INEPT IN THIS SUBJECT AREA.
YOUR HAVE A PERSONALITY DISORDER OF THE FIRST DEGREE WHICH PROBABLY DATES WAY BACK TO YOUR CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES. AT A GUESS, YOU WERE SEXUALLY ABUSED BY YOUR MOTHER OR FATHER, BUT I MIGHT BE WRONG.

TAKE A PIECE OF ADVICE SYBRAND. UNLESS YOU CAN CONTRIBUTE TO THIS NEWSGROUP WITHOUT EXPOSING YOUR REPUGNANT CHARACTER, I SUGGEST YOU GO AND USE YOUR MANY LONELY HOURS DOING SOMETHING THAT DOESN'T INVOLVE INTERFACING WITH OTHER HUMAN BEINGS. YOU NEED NOT READ ON. Question

I have developed a Form........... Received on Sat Dec 11 2004 - 09:04:24 CST