Thanks for your reply
Jerry Wang
"Howard J. Rogers" <hjr_at_dizwell.com> wrote in message
news:41abff1a$0$22705$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au...
> Jerry Wang wrote:
> > Dear All,
> >
> > We have the intention of upgrading our RAC DB 9.2.0.3 to 10g,
>
> Why? What is the compelling piece of functionality you currently lack,
> or that 10g offers?
>
> > but a
> > production site's statbility is most important to us.
>
> Then don't muck around with a stable solution you already have (assuming
> you already have one). 9i remains a supported platform for at least
> another 3 years or so.
>
> > Hope users using RAC DB 10g can share with us the information about its
> > stability and your feeling!!
>
> And if a few share anecdotes that "It's all OK", that will persuade you
> to make a fundamental change to your production system??! The basis on
> which you choose to upgrade should be: (a) obtain the new software (b)
> install it onto a test machine (c) stress-test it as realistically as
> possible. It should NOT be (d) ask a bunch of people I've never met and
> don't know whether I can trust what their "feelings" are!
>
> HJR
>
>
> > Thank you very much in advance!!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jackie
> >
> >
Received on Wed Dec 01 2004 - 03:55:18 CST
