joel-garry_at_home.com (Joel Garry) wrote in message news:<91884734.0411221445.4ddd9741_at_posting.google.com>...
> danthefirst2000_at_yahoo.com wrote in message news:<f5e9c941.0411211537.4599bb33_at_posting.google.com>...
> > Frank van Bortel <fvanbortel_at_netscape.net> wrote in message news:<cnl6tf$jt1$1_at_news3.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>...
> > > danthefirst2000_at_yahoo.com wrote:
> > >
> > > >>
> > > >>But it sounds like a really bad idea. Why are you doing it?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi
> > > > This is a requirement from the app support. This will be a one off
> > > > thing (hopefully) for about 3000 userids. Someone is from app support
> > > > is going to manage the userids / passowrds.
> > >
> > > And right there is your first error ^: passowrds?!?
> > > Are you getting a feeling why this will fail?
> >
> > Oh yes very funny...
> > i meant password. all been sorted now. thanks
>
> Don't tell me, let me guess... app support decided to use the userid
> or something close to it for the password? Or "welcome1" ?
>
> 10 to 1, if they didn't, they will within a year, or 10% turnover of
> the users, whichever comes before turnover of app support. :-O
>
> jg
hit the nail on the head there mate!!!
Received on Tue Nov 23 2004 - 20:21:35 CST
