Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Why the size of Oracle 10g database is much smaller than Oracle 9i?

Re: Why the size of Oracle 10g database is much smaller than Oracle 9i?

From: Lothar Armbruester <lothar.armbruester_at_t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:52:27 +0100
Message-ID: <PM0003E917EFDCC0E5@hades.none.local>


Ed Stevens wrote:
> On 16 Nov 2004 17:37:40 -0800, wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au (Noons) wrote:
>
>>Brian Dick <bdick_at_cox.net> wrote in message
> news:<kph48bk7nolx$.1dyli46ofitkf.dlg_at_40tude.net>...
>>> They only put the 1's on the disk and left off the 0's. Also, even
> though
>>> 0's were nothing, they were wider than the 1's and therefore took
> up more
>>> space.
>>
>>Now, THAT is compression!
>
> Of course, now you have to buy the supplementary zero kit. It's
> included in the Enterprise Edition license, but is an extra cost item
> for Standard Edition licensees.
>
> And Patch #73.b is required to fix the routine that merges the zeros
> back in to the installed binaries.

In fact the first patch set for 10g on Solaris is 648MB in Size (IIRC). Maybe that's the other half of the software. :-)

-- 
Lothar Armbrüster       | la_at_oktagramm.de
Hauptstr. 26            | la_at_heptagramm.de
D-65346 Eltville        | lothar.armbruester_at_t-online.de
Received on Wed Nov 17 2004 - 11:52:27 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US