Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: 9iR2 Logical Standby

Re: 9iR2 Logical Standby

From: Access <idmwarpzone_NOSPAM__at_yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 22:15:30 +0100
Message-ID: <41967977$0$20377$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be>

"Mark Bole" <makbo_at_pacbell.net> wrote in message news:lZtld.41472$QJ3.35225_at_newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
> Pete's wrote:
> > Vital info:
> >
> > Both servers are at AIX 5.2 ml 03, Oracle 9.2.0.4 EE. Database, PROD1
> > on SERVER1, QA_TEST1 on SERVER2.
> >
> > Questions:
> > Has anyone ever setup a logical standby for only a couple tables into
> > another database? I read through documentation on Logical Standby's
> > and how to set them up, is it required to have a complete copy of the
> > primary db to set it up on just a couple tables? Or is it just a
> > matter of setting up the all the SQL APPLY & LOG Transport services
> > correctly for it to work?
> >
> > TIA
> > Pete's
>
> Logical standby is based on the newer Oracle streams technology.
>
> To create the logical standby, yes you do need a complete copy of the
> primary database, but once initialized, you can use the DBMS_LOGSTDBY
> package which "provide[s] a way to skip applying archived redo logs to
> selected tables or entire schemas in the standby database...". This is
> handy if, say, you only have a few schemas in your primary and just want
> one of them to be kept up to date in the standby, while at the same time
> allowing other objects to be created (or dropped) only in the standby.
> Another benefit is that all the information is contained in the archive
> redo logs and there is no impact on the primary when you apply updates
> to the standby (other than copying the archive redo logs).
>
> On the other hand if you have hundreds of tables or dozens of schemas,
> and really do just want a few tables to be kept up to date, then it is
> probably overkill - try Advanced Replication (snapshots) instead, as
> another poster suggested.
>
> Warning: a logical standby used for this purpose should not be
> considered an integral part of a disaster recovery plan (that is, don't
> think of trying to switch over to it if your primary fails).
>
> -Mark Bole
>
>

Regarding this last paragraph : why not ? Received on Sat Nov 13 2004 - 15:15:30 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US