Re: Oracle security alert #68 - advice?

Andy Hardy <junkmail@[127.0.0.1]> wrote in message news:<rlOJKiD2uqcBFw5m@[127.0.0.1]>...
> In message <910046b4.0410141855.6dbc4bbe_at_posting.google.com> , Paul
> Drake <bdbafh_at_gmail.com> writes
> >Andy Hardy <junkmail@[127.0.0.1]> wrote in message
> >news:<lZsKl6Ci2WbBFwCb@[127.0.0.1]>...
> >> In message <416C36DD.11C374A2_at_YourShoesyahoo.com> , Walt
> >> <walt_askier_at_YourShoesyahoo.com> writes
> >> >
> >> >I'd like to apply the patch for Oracle Security Alert #68
> >> ><http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/showdoc?db=NOT&id=281188.1.>
> >>
> >> I hope that the 9i patch is better than the 8i one - consists of 589
> >> files and a readme saying where they all should be copied to...
> >
> >it depends.
>
> It's amazing that an 'essential' patch has been rolled out in such a
> 'loose' manner!
>
> I'd be interested in the WIn32/817 batch script...

Andy,

my above email address is valid - email me backchannel for a copy.

-bdbafh Received on Sun Oct 17 2004 - 17:36:27 CDT