Re: Tuning question - low cpu_time, high elapsed_time - what gives?

fitzjarrell_at_cox.net (David Fitzjarrell) wrote in message news:<9711ade0.0410141711.a3c7634_at_posting.google.com>...
> teraknowledgesystems_at_yahoo.com (omlet v4) wrote in message news:<fc85c159.0410132307.3f39cabc_at_posting.google.com>...
> > "Ana C. Dent" <anacedent_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<Xns958147C1A357ASunnySD_at_68.6.19.6>...
> > > BigBoote66_at_hotmail.com (Steve B) wrote in
> > > news:67bcf80a.0410121254.4e553c81_at_posting.google.com:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for your advice - I believe I see where you're coming from.
> > > > I'm not familiar with the Oracle-L email list - can you give me a URL?
> > >
> > > Rhetorical question -
> > > Are you too lazy or too incompetent to use GOOGLE?
> >
> > Ar you too bitchy or too witchy to just give the damn url?
>
> Anyone too lazy to look on google for a url doesn't deserve such
> service. Especially when that person has been directed there in a
> prior post.

Yeah: go ahead and crash their database; is that what they deserve ?! Received on Sun Oct 17 2004 - 03:33:09 CDT