Re: Tuning question - low cpu_time, high elapsed_time - what gives?

fitzjarrell_at_cox.net (David Fitzjarrell) wrote in message news:<9711ade0.0410141711.a3c7634_at_posting.google.com>...
> teraknowledgesystems_at_yahoo.com (omlet v4) wrote in message news:<fc85c159.0410132307.3f39cabc_at_posting.google.com>...
> > "Ana C. Dent" <anacedent_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<Xns958147C1A357ASunnySD_at_68.6.19.6>...
> > > BigBoote66_at_hotmail.com (Steve B) wrote in
> > > news:67bcf80a.0410121254.4e553c81_at_posting.google.com:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for your advice - I believe I see where you're coming from.
> > > > I'm not familiar with the Oracle-L email list - can you give me a URL?
> > >
> > > Rhetorical question -
> > > Are you too lazy or too incompetent to use GOOGLE?
> >
> > Ar you too bitchy or too witchy to just give the damn url?
>
> Anyone too lazy to look on google for a url doesn't deserve such
> service. Especially when that person has been directed there in a
> prior post.
>
> Funny you making comments about being bitchy ...
>
> David Fitzjarrell

As it happens I did try to use Google to find an archive ("oracle-l email archive"). However, after wading through the first few pages of links and finding nothing but sign up pages and forum postings that referred to the mailing list (I had overlooked the single link to faqchest), I thought the question to be not out of line. So please, consider me incompetent, not lazy.

-Steve Received on Fri Oct 15 2004 - 08:57:53 CDT