Hans Forbrich wrote:
> Ed Stevens wrote:
>
>
>>I know you're trying to provide full information, but for the sake of
>>security, you should have masked your IP address. I was able to paste
>>your tnsnames entry into my tnsnames file and ...
>
>
> 192.168.x.x are free to be used inside firewalls and should not be public.
> You could easily have hit any number of sites that use that numbering and
> have accidently exposed themselves to the big internet.
>
> Same for 10.x.x.x and 172.16.x.x-> 172.31.x.x
>
> http://www.stanford.edu/group/networking/lnaguide/docs/nat.html
>
> /Hans
...apart from the fact that they're no-routable addresses?
Steve
Received on Mon Oct 11 2004 - 12:04:22 CDT
