Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle 10g RAC Question

Re: Oracle 10g RAC Question

From: Dusan Bolek <pagesflames_at_usa.net>
Date: 6 Oct 2004 07:56:53 -0700
Message-ID: <1e8276d6.0410060656.32852c8d@posting.google.com>


Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message news:<1097040504.120175_at_yasure>...
> Dusan Bolek wrote:
>
> > My advice based on my experiences with RAC is never use RAC, if there
> > is any way how to do the job without it! .
>
> My advice, based on experience at little organizations like The Boeing
> Company, AT&T Wireless, and Amazon.com is that RAC is wonderful when
> properly implemented and produces great scalability with costs far below
> that of SMP.
>
> If you are having problems I can put you in contact with a consultant
> that can help you: Just contact me off-line.

I'm not saying that RAC is crappy and useless, there are very good reasons for implementing RAC technology in some cases. However, I do not see RAC as a general solution for anyone. Keg said that he is unable to tune his SGA and that's the reason why he looks for RAC. I wrote him that most likely he is not going to solve anything. My approach when implementing systems is to keep it as simple as possible, RAC is definitely a complication and all complications in a design must be well reasoned. There are reasons for implementing RAC such as need for very quick failover in the case of a failure or an application demand above the reasonable scaling level of single node system. However, for a majority of applications I believe single mode is still a way to go.
And if we're talking about problems, just look to the Metalink and you can easily find several quite nasty problems still remaining after 9.2.0.5 patchset (which is not very good one anyway). Just imagine how would you feel, when you encounter some of them on your business critical 24x7 system and everyone around is shouting on you. Well, you can tell them that "The Boeing Company, AT&T Wireless, and Amazon.com" are not having this problem. :-)
Right now, I have a problem with cross-archivation between nodes which is simply not working. I have a brand new bug created on this, but there is at least another one bug related to this (should be solved by 9.2.0.6 as promised).

--
Dusan Bolek
http://www.db-support.com

Email: spambin_at_seznam.cz
Pls add "Not Guilty" to the subject, otherwise your email will face an
unpleasant end as SPAM.
Received on Wed Oct 06 2004 - 09:56:53 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US