I'm not concerned about the alert log. I'm more concerned about trace files
that are generated in udump.
"Joel Garry" <joel-garry_at_home.com> wrote in message
news:91884734.0408311622.6b036744_at_posting.google.com...
> "DK" <dakight_at_bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:<eVQYc.67979$0o5.2035_at_bignews1.bellsouth.net>...
> > I recently had a trace file that eventually got to 15gb before the
> > ORACLE_HOME directory was maxed out at 100%. I've sent the trace file
off
> > to Oracle and set the max trace file to 5mb. However, I see that in 9i
the
> > bdump\cdump locations are dynamic parameters. If I move the bdump
location
> > to a non-consequential file system other than ORACLE_HOME will oracle
have
> > problems if it can't write to the file system because of space problems
when
> > attempting to generate a trace file??
>
> I think Oracle may be very unhappy if it can't write to the alert log.
> Or someone may be unhappy if they don't know what Oracle would have
> written.
>
> jg
> --
> @home.com is bogus.
> http://www.netfunny.com/rhf/jokes/04/Aug/death.html
Received on Tue Aug 31 2004 - 20:49:44 CDT
