Re: Thinking about archived redo-logs SIZE

From: Howard J. Rogers <hjr_at_dizwell.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 00:02:40 +1000
Message-ID: <4122101e$0$18394$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>

Dusan Bolek wrote:

> "Howard J. Rogers" <hjr_at_dizwell.com> wrote in message
> news:<41219480$0$18394$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au>...

>> > ARCHIVE_LAG_TARGET forces a log switch after the time specified.
>> 
>> 
>> That is 10g specific, if I'm not much mistaken.

>
> Not true.

It's a fair cop. Yes, it was there in 9i Release 1. I just checked the documentation.

I'll just shut up for a while until I can actually get my hands on a database again. For now, I'm just relying on memory.

In my defence, I would point out that this parameter is switched *off* by default (that is, set to 0 by default).

Regards
HJR Received on Tue Aug 17 2004 - 09:02:40 CDT