Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: recovery strategies for multi-terabyte database

Re: recovery strategies for multi-terabyte database

From: Joel Garry <joel-garry_at_home.com>
Date: 16 Aug 2004 16:16:39 -0700
Message-ID: <91884734.0408161516.5bdfa1d3@posting.google.com>


Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message news:<1092447562.913049_at_yasure>...
> Prem K Mehrotra wrote:
>
> > Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message news:<1092406609.341901_at_yasure>...
> >
> >>Rob De Langhe wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>we are interested to know what DBAs have selected as realistic recovery
> >>>(and corresponding backup) strategy for a database with multiple
> >>>terabytes of data.
> >>>
> >>>Internet talks everywhere about backup performances, but nowhere the
> >>>actual recovery method is discussed for such a large database. Even when
> >>>doing online backups, you still need a way to get this huge dbase back
> >>>into a consistent mode, or get a set of data backup in the dbase.
> >>>
> >>>We are using Solaris-9, Oracle 9.2, SAN storage, Veritas Netbackup, and
> >>>LTO tape robot.
> >>>
> >>>TIA for any suggestions
> >>>
> >>>Rob
> >>
> >>Get a duplicate storage array likely NetApp, EMC, Hitachi, or IBM and
> >>use the snap-mirror capability to mirror changed blocks to the second
> >>array. Be sure the duplicate array is at least 500 miles away from
> >>the primary and connect them with a T3.
> >>
> >>Then don't waste your time backing up anything.
> >
> > Dan:
> >
> > Pardon my ignorance, what happends if something got corrpted, you
> > accidently deleted some data/table or for whatever reaosn you have to
> > do point in time recovery. How will one accomplish that using
> > snap-mirror type of backups.
>
> Corruption:
> Same thing that happens when you have a tape containing corrupt blocks.
>
> Deletion:
> Learn about how snap works ... learn about how table flashback works.
> Implement the appropriate solution.
>
> Point-in-time:
> Archive logs
>
> To be truthful I was being a bit flippant. I do believe in backups.
> But not like I used to. I haven't had to run for a backup tape in
> more than 5 years. And I don't believe anyone is backing up today's
> mutli-terabyte databases to tape anymore.

Is http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3FA92229.F1ECFA%40remove_spam.peasland.com&output=gplain out of date?

jg

--
@home.com is bogus.
I think it is more important to be able to recover from mistakes than
to avoid them.  You can't avoid them.
Received on Mon Aug 16 2004 - 18:16:39 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US