Re: Shared Pool: Can it be filled over 100% ? - OK, it can ...

From: omlet <notrolls_at_notrolls.omlet.org.notrolls>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 17:44:13 -0400
Message-ID: <ea06d87845985e55870eb1ed4acf2371@localhost.talkaboutdatabases.com>

P.S. My ORA-04031 disappered after increasing shared_pool_size from 80M to 100M?

For this you should be given the high heels ( wouldn't that be same as "givin" the boots)! Hun.

Did it really "disappered"?! and what 100M? What are you doing? Having a big party by this pool?! Hun, go back by the corner and earn your $20 per .. you seem more natural there.

Did it really "disappered"?! or did it really?!

Lil Received on Mon Aug 16 2004 - 16:44:13 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: atiqul: "Oracle 9i on Mandrake 10 failure"
Previous message: Joel Garry: "Re: Which is better: Oracle or SQLServer"
In reply to: Jan Gelbrich: "Re: Shared Pool: Can it be filled *over* 100% ? - OK, it can ..."
Next in thread: David Fitzjarrell: "Re: Shared Pool: Can it be filled *over* 100% ? - OK, it can ..."
Reply: David Fitzjarrell: "Re: Shared Pool: Can it be filled *over* 100% ? - OK, it can ..."
Reply: Jan Gelbrich: "Shut Up, You ! (n/t)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US