Re: First

Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message news:<1091760257.481557_at_yasure>...

>
> Once again ... reread the OP's post. The request never once indicated an
> interest in first anything. FIRST only occurs in some crude pseudocode.
> It is not in the description of what was requested.

What the hell, are you hitting the Glenfiddich again? The code fragment was clarifying what the OP wanted. Why do you think everyone else is wrong? Should we not have corrected the typo "link" to "like" and added a question mark to complete the sentence?

OP:
>Hi,
>
>Does Qracle 9i support a SELECT that returns
>only a subset of the records
>
>something link
>
>SELECT FIRST 1 * FROM tablename

jg

--
@home.com is bogus.
Take investors money, bankrupt company, then buy back company from
bankruptcy for pennies.  Is this a great country or what? 
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20040806/news_1b6xelan.html