Re: Oracle and max concurent users

From: ab <mail_at_news.fr>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 09:57:08 +0200
Message-ID: <cevdjb$gom$1@s5.feed.news.oleane.net>

Sybrand Bakker wrote:

>>Thanks for the quick answer. Just another one: Does 32K means 32000 connections
>>per instance?

>
>
>
> that's what it says.
>

>>For example, if I install a 10g oracle db on a linux server (standard install with one
>>instance), It will support 32000 connections?

>
>
> it should, however of course the server should have sufficient RAAM
>

>>It is possible to incease this value?

>
>
> If this would have been possible, why would they specify it as a
> *limit*
>
>
>

>>Regards.

>
>
> --
> Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA

Thanks a lot for all these precisions.

Many Regards. Received on Fri Aug 06 2004 - 02:57:08 CDT