Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Is Raid 5 really that bad for Oracle?

Re: Is Raid 5 really that bad for Oracle?

From: Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 06:43:28 -0700
Message-ID: <1091454243.274093@yasure>


omlet wrote:

> I would suggest renaming RAID to RAED; as stuffing as many fiber spindles
> with the fastest 15Krpm disks ain't cheap!
> Ok may be a better name is DLDMNIT.
>
> PS. Just in case you wonder what is DLDMNIT; keep guessing? If you figure
> it out; you can redeem a prize!
>
> Hint: It has something to do with the Iranian Jewish girl that busted
> Daniel Morgans balls for not knowing "vi"! Call Netapp for a clue?!
>
> BAARF is a shameless gang who promotes self destructive not-so expertly
> hogwash.
>
> You would think that Oracle knows what is best for Oracle! What are those
> idiots take the world for?!
>
> Yahoo! uses RAID4/5 technology; CISCO uses RAID4/5 technology, to just to
> name few?!

<REALITY CHECK>
I am not now nor have I have been an employee of NetApp. </REALITY CHECK>

omlet is to knowledge what rm -r is to the root directory.

-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with 'u' to respond)
Received on Mon Aug 02 2004 - 08:43:28 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US