Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Is Raid 5 really that bad for Oracle?
omlet wrote:
> I would suggest renaming RAID to RAED; as stuffing as many fiber spindles
> with the fastest 15Krpm disks ain't cheap!
> Ok may be a better name is DLDMNIT.
>
> PS. Just in case you wonder what is DLDMNIT; keep guessing? If you figure
> it out; you can redeem a prize!
>
> Hint: It has something to do with the Iranian Jewish girl that busted
> Daniel Morgans balls for not knowing "vi"! Call Netapp for a clue?!
>
> BAARF is a shameless gang who promotes self destructive not-so expertly
> hogwash.
>
> You would think that Oracle knows what is best for Oracle! What are those
> idiots take the world for?!
>
> Yahoo! uses RAID4/5 technology; CISCO uses RAID4/5 technology, to just to
> name few?!
<REALITY CHECK>
I am not now nor have I have been an employee of NetApp.
</REALITY CHECK>
omlet is to knowledge what rm -r is to the root directory.
-- Daniel A. Morgan University of Washington damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace 'x' with 'u' to respond)Received on Mon Aug 02 2004 - 08:43:28 CDT