Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Is Raid 5 really that bad for Oracle?

Re: Is Raid 5 really that bad for Oracle?

From: omlet <notrolls_at_notrolls.omlet.org.notrolls>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 02:29:34 -0400
Message-ID: <f22beb8f20202b298380f42c31b81a7f@localhost.talkaboutdatabases.com>

I would suggest renaming RAID to RAED; as stuffing as many fiber spindles with the fastest 15Krpm disks ain't cheap! Ok may be a better name is DLDMNIT.

PS. Just in case you wonder what is DLDMNIT; keep guessing? If you figure it out; you can redeem a prize!

Hint: It has something to do with the Iranian Jewish girl that busted Daniel Morgans balls for not knowing "vi"! Call Netapp for a clue?!

BAARF is a shameless gang who promotes self destructive not-so expertly hogwash.

You would think that Oracle knows what is best for Oracle! What are those idiots take the world for?!

Yahoo! uses RAID4/5 technology; CISCO uses RAID4/5 technology, to just to name few?! Received on Mon Aug 02 2004 - 01:29:34 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US