Re: Separate foreign keys with shared ID space

From: Greg D. Moore $Strider$ <mooregr_deleteth1s_at_greenms.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 19:40:25 GMT
Message-ID: <JASOc.4143$Qp.781@twister.nyroc.rr.com>

"Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message news:LPQOc.63922$eM2.25470_at_attbi_s51...
> "Christian Antognini" <christian.antognini_at_trivadis.com> wrote in message
news:410affcf$1_at_post.usenet.com...
> >
> > A PK should have no business meaning.
>
> Says who? Can you justify this statement?

Hmm, I want to see what Joe Celko says about this one....

>
>
> Marshall
>
>
Received on Sat Jul 31 2004 - 14:40:25 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Howard J. Rogers: "Re: Commands Used to Create Existing Contraint and Index"
Previous message: Hans Forbrich: "Re: Separate foreign keys with shared ID space"
In reply to: Marshall Spight: "Re: Separate foreign keys with shared ID space"
Next in thread: Erland Sommarskog: "Re: Separate foreign keys with shared ID space"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US