Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle 9iAS vs Oracle 10g AS

Re: Oracle 9iAS vs Oracle 10g AS

From: Ana C. Dent <anacedent_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 19:27:14 GMT
Message-ID: <Xns95307EB08BCB5SunnySD@68.12.19.6>


Hans Forbrich <forbrich_at_yahoo.net> wrote in news:cOZLc.108919$eO.78747_at_edtnps89:

> Joel Garry wrote:
>

>> One 10g downside:  If on Windows, some tools like repca don't work
>> and haven't been around long enough for support to admit it.  Even if
>> people complain, support calls about it are never resolved because
>> people just wipe out everything and start over.
>> 

>
> WHile true, the upside is that the 'rest' of 10g can be on Windows and
> the infrastructure/repository be the only thing on a Linux/Unix
> machine.
>
> Infra should be centralized anyway, and you definitely want a High
> Availability environment, so Linux may not be out of the question ...
> and it encourages NOT putting infra on the same box as the apps.

Not that this is recommended practice, but the middle tier systems will continue to function normally even with the infrastructure node shutdown down. This is as long as the middle tier systems stay up. Received on Sat Jul 24 2004 - 14:27:14 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US